I thought the usability was great, very easy to navigate and easy to use.
Just looked like it was made in MS paint ahah.
Thanks for reading - Michael
Take this with a grain of salt as I'm not too knowledgable on stuff like this, but when you said
"It has great security I just think it would be safer if it didn't run in game, and maybe it was all based off of the website, such as settings changing and others."
Changing settings from the website won't change the fact that there is a .dll injected into the game, which is what VAC sigscans for. Menus have nothing to do with detection. In Valve games. (Other games with BattlEye may as they scan your screen for ESP and potentially menus afaik)
And if the cheat has to constantly be making webrequests to check for updated settings you may notice connection issues. Or if the site itself detects settings changed, to send data to your PC, you will notice some lag (similar to when saving configs in the menu)
Although hosting settings on the website has worked for other providers, it is tedious and has no real benefit and the devs should focus on other things.
Nice review nonetheless, and it was good thinking.
@sairento said:Take this with a grain of salt as I'm not too knowledgable on stuff like this, but when you said
"It has great security I just think it would be safer if it didn't run in game, and maybe it was all based off of the website, such as settings changing and others."
Changing settings from the website won't change the fact that there is a .dll injected into the game, which is what VAC sigscans for. Menus have nothing to do with detection. In Valve games. (Other games with BattlEye may as they scan your screen for ESP and potentially menus afaik)
And if the cheat has to constantly be making webrequests to check for updated settings you may notice connection issues. Or if the site itself detects settings changed, to send data to your PC, you will notice some lag (similar to when saving configs in the menu)
Although hosting settings on the website has worked for other providers, it is tedious and has no real benefit and the devs should focus on other things.
Nice review nonetheless, and it was good thinking.
Yea I didnt even think about that, but I was thinking more towards the lines of not injecting it the game, run from a CMD prompt as an .exe!
.ddl is much easier detected than a .exe but yea aha
@Mxchael said:@sairento said:Take this with a grain of salt as I'm not too knowledgable on stuff like this, but when you said
"It has great security I just think it would be safer if it didn't run in game, and maybe it was all based off of the website, such as settings changing and others."
Changing settings from the website won't change the fact that there is a .dll injected into the game, which is what VAC sigscans for. Menus have nothing to do with detection. In Valve games. (Other games with BattlEye may as they scan your screen for ESP and potentially menus afaik)
And if the cheat has to constantly be making webrequests to check for updated settings you may notice connection issues. Or if the site itself detects settings changed, to send data to your PC, you will notice some lag (similar to when saving configs in the menu)
Although hosting settings on the website has worked for other providers, it is tedious and has no real benefit and the devs should focus on other things.
Nice review nonetheless, and it was good thinking.
Yea I didnt even think about that, but I was thinking more towards the lines of not injecting it the game, run from a CMD prompt as an .exe!
.ddl is much easier detected than a .exe but yea aha
You mean like an external? That would restrict the cheats features.
dlls and externals to not really differ in terms of detection rate afaik. .dlls just are harder to make undetected with all the hooks.