@EpicHacker said:veuillez ajouter un résolveur (anti-anti-visée) pour une expérience hvh parfaite
I don't think its a good idea, with this option you get noticed quite easily even if you don't use aimbot 100%
@berbere said:@EpicHacker said:veuillez ajouter un résolveur (anti-anti-visée) pour une expérience hvh parfaite
I don't think its a good idea, with this option you get noticed quite easily even if you don't use aimbot 100%
That... makes absolutely no sense?
I don't think there's really enough interest in the csgo cheat to warrant the effort needed to keep the cheat competitive in a HvH environment.
@mcdonaldsbandit said:@berbere a dit:@EpicHacker a déclaré:veuillez ajouter un résolveur (anti-anti-visée) pour une expérience hvh parfaite
Je ne pense pas que ce soit une bonne idée, avec cette option, vous vous faites remarquer assez facilement même si vous n'utilisez pas aimbot à 100%
Cela ... n'a absolument aucun sens?
Je ne pense pas qu'il y ait vraiment suffisamment d'intérêt pour la triche csgo pour justifier l'effort nécessaire pour garder la triche compétitive dans un environnement HvH.
Of course, there are a lot of cheaters out there who don't want to get banned even though they know it's risky. Even for free games because you have to start all over.
The option you have proposed may be interesting on a game where there are open servers for cheaters only, but I personally do not know anyone.
Thank you for being honest with your review. PA isn't really the best option for rage features as I've noticed from csgo. D2 was pretty good to rage with but its gone.
@mcdonaldsbandit said:That... makes absolutely no sense?
I don't think there's really enough interest in the csgo cheat to warrant the effort needed to keep the cheat competitive in a HvH environment.
@berbere said:Of course, there are a lot of cheaters out there who don't want to get banned even though they know it's risky. Even for free games because you have to start all over.
The option you have proposed may be interesting on a game where there are open servers for cheaters only, but I personally do not know anyone.
Guys, I don't think this review is about CSGO, it says Team Fortress 2 for the review. Also, IDK about tf2 but people do like to HVH on CSGO. I personally don't do it but I know many who do. Surely people like to hvh on tf2 as well so if people buy it expecting to be able to HVH well then I can understand why he could be disappointed with the cheat.
@mcdonaldsbandit said:@Resh said:
You're completely right, definitely missed that.
That does open up some confusion since only the counter strike cheats advertise any sort of hvh features so I'm not really sure how you would buy tf2 expecting any of those.
no i believe tf2 does feature a few hvh features. Looked back at my recordings when i used it and it had a Box that you could check to turn on HVH features. If its not listed on the cheat features I have no clue why.
Not sure. Maybe he just assumed it had hvh features or maybe he just noticed he could hvh with it and was just disappointed with it
i dunno tho
@EpicHacker said:please add a resolver (anti-anti aim) for a perfect hvh experience
I can't tell you anything they haven't already told you, this is not the place to ask this anyway. There are other threads for this. Greetings.