@samuelxk said:@wanghhh said:Waiting for the internal version to be released, it will be more perfect!!
I dont know anything about it, but doesnt internal would be more dangerous to get banned?
Yes and no.
Externals are supposedly safer, but in the end, it depends on the provider. But internals are writing into the memory of the game, externals only reads.
@Sylar said:@samuelxk said:@wanghhh said:Waiting for the internal version to be released, it will be more perfect!!
I dont know anything about it, but doesnt internal would be more dangerous to get banned?
Yes and no.
Externals are supposedly safer, but in the end, it depends on the provider. But internals are writing into the memory of the game, externals only reads.
Everything you said is incorrect apart from the provider bit
External cheats still read and write, otherwise ESP and other features would be impossible to add since you have to write on the game process
Theres really no difference apart from external and internal, External cheats are just an overlay hack and internal cheats are forced to be injected right into the games process
The success of the cheat doesnt depend on if its external or internal, it depends on the provider and the bypass
@Zongplop said:@Sylar said:@samuelxk said:@wanghhh said:Waiting for the internal version to be released, it will be more perfect!!
I dont know anything about it, but doesnt internal would be more dangerous to get banned?
Yes and no.
Externals are supposedly safer, but in the end, it depends on the provider. But internals are writing into the memory of the game, externals only reads.Everything you said is incorrect apart from the provider bit
External cheats still read and write, otherwise ESP and other features would be impossible to add since you have to write on the game process
Theres really no difference apart from external and internal, External cheats are just an overlay hack and internal cheats are forced to be injected right into the games process
The success of the cheat doesnt depend on if its external or internal, it depends on the provider and the bypass
Some externals, which is the point of why they went popular at first, doesn't write into memory actually. Even those with visuals used to draw over the game. Not into. So you are wrong there. Am not.
Some externals do write, but, that ruins the point of being external tbh. And it is usually for misc features like speedhack or so on, stuffs impacting the game itself and not the aim or visuals.
@Sylar said:@Zongplop said:@Sylar said:@samuelxk said:@wanghhh said:Waiting for the internal version to be released, it will be more perfect!!
I dont know anything about it, but doesnt internal would be more dangerous to get banned?
Yes and no.
Externals are supposedly safer, but in the end, it depends on the provider. But internals are writing into the memory of the game, externals only reads.Everything you said is incorrect apart from the provider bit
External cheats still read and write, otherwise ESP and other features would be impossible to add since you have to write on the game process
Theres really no difference apart from external and internal, External cheats are just an overlay hack and internal cheats are forced to be injected right into the games process
The success of the cheat doesnt depend on if its external or internal, it depends on the provider and the bypass
Some externals, which is the point of why they went popular at first, doesn't write into memory actually. Even those with visuals used to draw over the game. Not into. So you are wrong there. Am not.
Some externals do write, but, that ruins the point of being external tbh. And it is usually for misc features like speedhack or so on, stuffs impacting the game itself and not the aim or visuals.
"Some externals, ... doesn't write into memory actually."
"Some externals do write"
Please learn atleast the basics of the things you are trying to say, because simply searching "internal vs external cheats" on google or your web browser of choice shows what im saying
The top 5 links all say the same thing as me